WebbThe Simon’s two-stage design to determine sample size is one that is widely used and accepted in Phase II cancer trials. A number of alternative methods that implement adaptive aspects to the design have also been published and used in trials. Webb1 jan. 2002 · The optimal two-stage design was proposed by Simon. This method determines the adequate sample size by calculating the response probability of two groups with α and β errors [1, 2]....
Optimal Two-Stage Designs for Phase II Clinical Trials
Webb1 juli 2024 · Compared with the Gehan two-stage design, the Simon two-stage design has the advantage of being able to determine an early termination of trials when no or low anti-tumor activities... Webb8 feb. 2024 · In practice, Simon’s two-stage minimax and optimal designs are widely used for binary endpoint [2–7]. Simon’s designs allow early trial termination due to futility … max ratschow
Optimal two-stage design of single arm Phase II clinical trials …
WebbOptimal Two-Stage Designs for Phase II Clinical Trials; Integrated Phase II/III Study; Sample Size Planning for Developing Classifiers; Design, Monitoring and Analysis of Bayesian … WebbSimon's Two-Stage Design. PID:961; v1.0.2.0; Last Updated: 04/15/2024. Liangcai Zhang 1,2 and Ying Yuan 1,2. 1 Department of Statistics, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005. ... Simon R (1989). Optimal two-stage designs for phase II … Webb28 juli 2024 · Since Rich Simon proposed optimal design and minimax design for two-stage phase II trials in 1986, either of them has been chosen for most of phase II clinical trials. When designing a phase II trial, however, clinical trialists almost always question which design to select. max rate to give blood