Flatt v. superior court 1994 9 cal.4th 275
Web(6 Cal.App.4th at p. 1057.) In Flatt v. Superior Court, supra, 9 Cal.4th page 275, the court held that an attorney's duty of loyalty to an existing client negated any duty to give advice to a new or prospective client, representation of whom would irreconcilably conflict with the duty of loyalty to the existing client. Web(California Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.7(a), (d); see also, Flatt v. Superior Court (Daniel) (1994) 9 Cal.4th 275, 284.) Informed written consent generally requires both written disclosures by the lawyer to the clients and written consents provided by the clients.
Flatt v. superior court 1994 9 cal.4th 275
Did you know?
WebIf the attorney is representing a client with interests that are adverse to a former client, the test used for disqualification is whether there is a "substantial relationship" between the subjects of the current and former representation. (Flatt v. Superior Court (1994) 9 Cal. 4th 275, 283 [36 Cal. Rptr. 2d 537, 885 P.2d 950].) In this ... Web364; Flatt v. Superior Court (1994) 9 Cal.4th 275, 294 [an attorney owes a duty of care to his or her client of “‘conscientious fidelity’”]; Burgess v. Superior Court (1992) 2 Cal.4th …
WebFlatt v. Superior Court 9 cal. 4th 275, 36 cal. rptr. 2d 537, 885 p.2d 950 (1994) Based on plaintiff William Daniel’s dissatisfaction with the work performed by his first attorney, … WebThe first is the per se rule of disqualification which generally prevents an attorney from undertaking a representation which is adverse to a current client. (Flatt v. Superior Court (1994) 9 Cal. 4th 275, 284 [36 Cal. Rptr. 2d 537, 885 P.2d 950].) The attorney's duty of undivided loyalty prevents such simultaneous representation, even on ...
WebSanta Clara University School of Law Digital Commons Web" (Flatt v. Superior Court (1994) 9 Cal.4th 275, 283 (Flatt).) Where such a conflict of interest exists, and the former client has not consented to the current representation, …
WebApr 7, 2010 · (Flatt v. Superior Court (1994) 9 Cal.4th 275, 36 Cal.Rptr.2d 537, 885 P.2d 950 (Flatt ).) 16 In the course of its discussion, the Supreme Court distinguished the duty of loyalty, which was at issue in that case, from the duty of client confidentiality, which is at issue in cases of vicarious disqualification. To properly understand Flatt in ...
WebDec 27, 1994 · The trial court declined to grant defendants' motion for summary judgment, reasoning that there were triable issues of fact material to the issue of whether an … off sick over bank holidaysWebDec 28, 1994 · In Flatt v. Superior Court (1994) 9 Cal.4th 275, 283 (Flatt), the Supreme Court distinguished among the circumstances in which attorney disqualification … off sick self certificationWebFN 3. Thus, the facts here are distinguishable from those in Flatt v. Superior Court (1994) 9 Cal. 4th 275 [36 Cal. Rptr. 2d 537, 885 P.2d 950], upon which the majority mistakenly relies. There, the issue is the extent of a duty owed by an attorney to advise a new client seeking to sue an existing client of the attorney's firm. off sick memeWebFeb 18, 2016 · (Flatt v. Superior Court (1994) 9 Cal.4th 275, 284, 36 Cal.Rptr.2d 537, 885 P.2d 950 (Flatt).) “The most egregious conflict of interest is representation of clients whose interests are directly adverse in the same litigation. [Citation.] Such patently improper dual representation suggests to the clients—and to the public at large—that the ... off sick when pregnantWebDec 21, 2005 · ( Flatt v. Superior Court (1994) 9 Cal.4th 275, 283-284 [ 36 Cal.Rptr.2d 537, 885 P.2d 950].) This case involves successive representation. The trial court determined Bradley entered into an attorney-client relationship with Howard and Mark when he met with Smith, who was acting as the agent of Howard and Mark, and Smith … my farm life 3 downloadWebSuperior Court - 9 Cal. 4th 275, 36 Cal. Rptr. 2d 537, 885 P.2d 950 (1994) Rule: Cal. Bar R., Prof. Conduct Std. 3-310(C)(2) provides that an attorney shall not accept or continue … off sick slipWebCal.App.4th 1050 (“Truck Ins. Exchange”), Cal West Nurseries, Inc. v. Superior Court (2005) 129 Cal.App.4th 1170 ... (Ibid., citing Flatt v. Superior Court (1994) 9 Cal.4th 275, 285.) While these cases clearly stand for the proposition that dual representation of clients with adverse interests is impermissible (in the absence of informed ... off sick holiday entitlement