2024 Etepha v. director of patents

Etepha v. director of patents

Author: dfvr

August undefined, 2024

WebDirector of Patents.pdf from LAW IP at University of the Philippines Diliman. ETEPHA, A.G. v. DIR. OF PATENTS & WESTMONT PHARMACEUTICALS Functions of Trademarks … WebDec 29, 1995 · 26 Etepha v. Director of Patents, 16 SCRA 495 (1966). chanrobles virtual law library. 27 Ruben Agpalo, Trademark Law & Practice in the Philippines, 1990, p. 41. chanrobles virtual law library. 28 224 SCRA 437 (1993). chanrobles virtual law library. 29 Co Tiong v. Director of Patents, 95 Phil. 1 (1954); Lim Hoa v.

OFFICE OF THE R..Il.ESIDENT - Intellectual Property Office of …

WebThis is a petition for review assailing the Decision of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 24101, [1] reversing and setting aside the decision of the Bureau of Patents, Trademarks and Technology Transfer (BPTTT), [2] which denied private respondent's application for registration of the trade-mark, FLAVOR MASTER. On January 18, 1984, private … WebETEPHA VS. PATENTS SANCHEZ, J. G.R. No. L-20635, March 31, 1966 ETEPHA, A. G., PETITIONER, VS. DIRECTOR OF PATENTS AND WESTMONT PHARMACEUTICALS, … balaji sampath

Rulings in Intellectual Property Laws - Blogger

http://www.onlineservices.ipophil.gov.ph/ipcaselibrary/ipcasepdf/AP_IPC_14-2006-000023_Decision.pdf WebDIRECTOR OF PATENTS and WESTMONT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., respondents. McClure, Salas and Gonzalez, for petitioner. Sycip, Salazar, Manalo, Luna and … WebEtepha VS Director OF Patents A case in Intellectual Property Law - ETEPHA, A., petitioner, vs - StuDocu A case digest in Intellectual Property Law with focus on … balaji salted

34 Etepha v. Director of Patents.pdf - ETEPHA, A.G. v. DIR....

WebRelying on the doctrine enunciated in the Etepha case 7 and the earlier ruling in Lim Hoa vs. Director of Patents, 8 applicant-appellee contends that the DYNAFLEX mark would not confuse or deceive the buyers and subscribers of the DURAFLEX brand, because electrical wires are of great value and the purchasers thereof are generally intelligent ... WebSince the new constitution of Ethiopia enacted in 1995, Ethiopia's legal system consisted of federal law with bicameral legislature. The House of People's Representatives (HoPR) … argus hyundai i30 2019WebEste articulo presenta los métodos actualmente disponibles para la evaluación de proyectos, dejando de manifiesto las falencias de los métodos tradicionales como el Método de Flujos de Caja Descontados, cuando son usados para evaluar proyectos con alta incertidumbre, donde además los administrativos cuentan con la flexibilidad suficiente … argus instantané

"Web(Etepha v. Director of Patents, G.R. No. L‐20635, Mar. 31, 1966) S Development Corporation sued Shangrila Corporation for using the "S" logo and the tradename "Shangrila". The former claims that it was the first to register the logo and the tradename in the Philippines and that it had been using the same in its restaurant business. Shangrila ... " - Etepha v. director of patents

Etepha v. director of patents

WebThe Director of Patents aptly observes that it is "the common practice in the drug and pharmaceutical industries to 'fabricate' marks by using syllables or words suggestive of the ailments for which they are intended and adding thereto distinctive prefixes or suffixes". WebCorp. v. Director of Patents". The Appellant also claims that the ruling of the Supreme Court in Ong Ai Cui v. Director ofPhilippine Patent Office" cited by the Director, far from ... CA,G.R. No. 114508, 19 Nov. 1999, citing Etepha v. Director of Patents, 16 SCRA 495 (1966), Gabriel v. Perez, 55 SCRA406 (1974). Nestle v. New Zealand Page 3 of8 .

Did you know?

WebEtepha v. Director of Patents (G. No. L-20635) Issue: Whether or not petitioner’s trademark is registrable. Ruling: YES. That the word “tussin” figures as a component of both trademarks is nothing to wonder at. The Director of Patents aptly observes that it … WebBrewery, Inc. v. Court of Appeals', Appellant contended that by apPlyir 9 the test of dominancy, the words L.A. and LA, assuming that they are the dominant ... the cases of Etepha v. Director of Patents, et al. 9 (ATUSSIN v. PE TUSSIN), Mead Johnson & Co. v. N.V.J. van Dorp Ltd. 10 (ALASKA v. ALACTA) Cyanamid v. Director of Patents, et al. 11

WebMay 2, 1997 · In Masso Hermanos, S.A. vs. Director of Patents, 94 Phil. 136, 139 (1953), it was held that a dealer in shoes cannot register "Leather Shoes" as his trademark because that would be merely descriptive and it would be unjust to deprive other dealers in leather shoes of the right to use the same words with reference to their merchandise. No one ... WebDec 29, 1995 · [26] Etepha v. Director of Patents, 16 SCRA 495 (1966). [27] Ruben Agpalo, Trademark Law & Practice in the Philippines, 1990, p. 41. [28] 224 SCRA 437 (1993). [29] Co Tiong v. Director of Patents, 95 Phil. 1 (1954); Lim Hoa v. Director of Patents, 100 Phil. 214 (1956); American Wire & Cable Co. v. Director of Patents, 31 …

WebThe Director of Patents ruled that the trademark ATUSSIN may be registered even though PERTUSSIN had been previously registered from the same office, hence, this appeal. ISSUE: Whether or not ATUSSIN … WebSep 19, 2024 · ETEPHA v. DIRECTOR OF PATENTS + DECISION 123 Phil. 329 SANCHEZ, J.: To the question: May trademark ATUSSIN be registered, given the fact that PERTUSSIN, another trademark, had been previously registered in the Patent Office? …

WebEtepha v. Director of Patents .docx - Free download as Word Doc (.doc / .docx), PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or view presentation slides online. Scribd is the world's largest social reading and publishing site. argus ipadWebSec 123 (and its sub-paragraph), IPC Etepha v. Director of Patents, 16 SCRA 495 Baxter v. Zuazua, 5 Phil 160 Compania Gral de Tabacco v. Alhambra Cigar, 33 Phil 485 Ang v. Teodoro, 74 Phil 50 (1942) Arce Sons v. Selecta Biscuits, 1 SCRA 253 Kabushi Kaisha Isetan v. IAC, 203 SCRA 583 Asia Brewery v. argus inženjering kontaktWebPatent in Ethiopia. Patent is a legal form of protection that provides a person or legal entity with exclusive rights to exclude others from making, using, or selling a concept or … balaji sampath heightWebThe Director of Patents cites the following: "NUMOTOZINE" (Reg. No. 1990-S. renewed under Reg. No. 7461-R) for treatment of pneumonia, bronchitis, pleurisy. etc.; … balaji sampath infosysWebPerez, 154 Phil. 371 (1974) [Per J. Makasiar, First Division], Etepha, A.G. v. Director of Patents, 123 Phil. 329 (1966) [Per J. Sanchez, En· Banc]. 376 Phil. 628 ( 1999) [Per J. Pono, First Division], / Dissenting Opinion 3 G.R. Nos. 196372, 210224, 216104 & 219632 5 In the Middle Ages, the use of many kinds of marks on a variety of ... balaji sales indoreWeb—The Director of Patents answered affirmatively. Hence this appeal. On April 23, 1959, respondent Westmont Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a New Yorkcorporation, sought registration … balaji sampath quoraWebDirector of Patents, 95 Phil. 1, citing Nims, The Law of Unfair Competition and Trademarks, 4th ed., vol. 2, pp. 678-679). `The importance of this rule is emphasized by the increase of radio advertising in which we are deprived of help of our eyes and must depend entirely on the ear’ (Operators, Inc. v. Director of Patents, supra.)" balaji sampath ahaguru